On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 13:39:37 -0500, Kyle McMartin <kyle@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 11:36:46AM -0700, Kevin DeKorte wrote: > > The 2.6.32-40 kernel is pretty decent. On my T400 -39 didn't work at > > all. but -40 seems to do the trick nicely. It works happily with both > > intel and ati video cards. > > > > Thanks, it's likely still going to be a bit of a rough road as KMS > settles down from being out of tree to stabilizing in tree. Anyway, > thanks for testing. The 2.6.32 f12 kernels seem to be working OK for me in general. I don't think anything has bitten me recently. I have an rv530 on -39 (which will go to -40 today) and an nv20 something on and another machine used headless on the -40 kernel. On the 2.6.33 kernel I opened a bug about some traceback like info related to encrypted block devices (but things work). I continue to see only one cpu used from time to time, but that is an old issue going way back. -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
