On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 09:14 -0500, James Laska wrote: > > In fact, the classification of the installation tests should now be > > adjusted to this system - classifying tests by release stage rather > than > > the arbitrary 'tier' concept - since we now have proper per-release > > release criteria. > > I hear you're point, but arbitrary isn't the most accurate way to > describe the years of built up test knowledge that contributed to the > current method for prioritizing install testing [3]. Sorry, missed this bit until I just went back through for FWN. It wasn't the actual classification of tests I was referring to as 'arbitrary', but the grouping of them into 'tiers' which don't really correspond directly to anything else. Anyway, the page is getting re-done based on release now, so no biggie :) -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
