On 12/02/2009 12:18 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 09:53 -0800, John Poelstra wrote:
Thank you to everyone who provided feedback to the first email and added
updates to the wiki and talk pages. I've also gone through the emails
to make sure the points raised there were integrated.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_13_Alpha_Release_Criteria
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_13_Beta_Release_Criteria
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_13_Final_Release_Criteria
This is a last reminder to review the pages if you have not already. We
will be discussing and resolving all of the outstanding items on the on
"Talk" tab for each wiki page during the FUDCon Hackfests on Sunday
(2009-12-06) with a collection of people from QA, Releng and Development.
I still think point 12. is a misuse of 'critical path'. Critical path
packages are critical in so far as they must not break the critical path
towards installation, boot and login. But that does not mean that the
overloaded and overused term 'regression' should be used unqalified
here.
Thanks for all your feedback in your previous post too! I either made
the changes or added it to a list of items to discuss at FUDCon. In
this case I added it to:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Talk:Fedora_13_Final_Release_Criteria#Open_Items
John
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
