Re: Fedora 12 QA retrospective - feedback needed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



It seems to me that this time there are way too many "unupgradable"
packages.  I mean by this that when upgrading from a maintaned
Fedora 10 or 11 installation packages "on hand" have higher version
than even _updates_ for Fedora 12 and are turned into
pseudo-orphans.

With broken 'package-cleanup --problems' (see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541551) that adds an
extra excitement and some of these "lefovers" break due to missing
dependencies.

Here are some of these I was quickly made aware of:
alsa-plugins-pulseaudio
gnumeric
iptstate
iw
libotf
libnetfilter_conntrack
libvolume_id
sos
tetex-elsevier
tigervnc

and most likely trawling through bugzilla will bring more.

Interestingly enough 'yum downgrade ...' does not work for tigervnc
packages and at least tigervnc-server breaks due to a wrong version
of openssl libraries.

   Michal

-- 
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux