On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 07:07:19AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 21:28 -0500, Scott Robbins wrote: > > > I really don't see a good reason not to have it. I know that Windows > > refugees like quick boots, but don't see 3 seconds making that big a > > difference. > > > > (Dinosaur that I am, I've always thought that there is too much emphasis > > on quick boots with pretty splash screens, but that's just the old vs. > > the new and all that rot.) > > FWIW, I would support this. As a data point, in my experience people > don't count the bootloader time in deciding if a system 'boots fast' or > not. If they see a fast boot from _after_ the bootloader to desktop, > they consider it to be a fast booting system. Then do you think it's worth filing an RFE (a RFE? Hrrm. ok a request for enhancement) or perhaps a bug against grub? If so, I'll try to get it done in the next few days, (unless someone else feels like doing it.) :) -- Scott Robbins PGP keyID EB3467D6 ( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 ) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6 Drusilla: Your face is a poem. I can read it. Xander: It doesn't say 'spare me' by any chance? -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list