On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 15:15 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 11/24/2009 01:43 PM, James Laska wrote: > > Good points. My $0.02. I'd suggest we narrow the focus to all > > applications accessible from the menu for the LiveCD or default install. > > Would I like to see this expand, definitely. I don't want to bite off > > more than we can chew. > > > > One *favorite* LiveCD regardless if it's the Gnome one or not over > another one will gradually start causing rift in the community. That's certainly not what QA would hope to convey from this process. As an exercise for the reader ... I intentionally didn't specify which LiveCD. > All spins should be treated equal in the eyes of QA ;) It sounds like a good long-term goal, but I don't fully agree that we could hit this short-term. However, we shouldn't be making it more difficult or excluding other spins. > It's just up to the relevant spins sig on how much they work with QA. > > The more they work with QA the more the spin is exposed to testing.. That's a good approach. What can we offer as a benefit for working with QA? Thanks, James
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
