On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 10:23:55PM -0500, Todd Zullinger wrote: > Adam Williamson wrote: > > Unfortunately, this didn't happen in time for Fedora 12. But seeing > that it's been broken since Fedora 11, another week or two shouldn't > kill us. :) It won't kill us, but sheesh, you should see some of the comments on the forums. :) It really only becomes an issue during a new release. As I said in my original post, it's a relatively minor issue--the majority of folks who don't know how to use google will post a complaint in the forums and get their answer--sometimes sympathetic, sometimes rude, but they'll get their answer. > NOTE: Please don't confuse the 'Hash:' line in the *CHECKSUM file, > (which is part of the PGP signature) with the type of hash > algorithm used to verify the .iso files > > might only server to add confusion to those who weren't already > confused. I think many of the users who were confused downloaded via > the torrents and likely never saw the fp.o/verify page at all anyway. I agree with that. A very simple comment, such as your suggestion, should be ample, and cause less confusion than a detailed explanation. (I'm leaving in your suggestion for those who missed it the first time.) :) > > I think something along the lines of: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > To verify the file(s) listed below, run: > > sha256sum -c Fedora-12-i686-Live-CHECKSUM' > > See https://fedoraproject.org/verify for more details. -- Scott Robbins PGP keyID EB3467D6 ( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 ) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6 Spike: So when do we destroy the world, already? -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list