On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 6:51 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 14:38 +0100, Adam Pribyl wrote: >> On Tue, 17 Nov 2009, Richard Ryniker wrote: >> >> > >> > Can the Fedora update mechanism hook into the original Firefox update >> > scheme in some way that allows Firefox to continue its successful >> > update strategy and avoid the reported Fedora breakage? >> > >> >> This is something I am asking too. Maybe the best thing would be to ask >> Mozilla, if they have some bright idea howto solve this. > > Why should we have one application have a different update process from > every other application? > > That way lies madness. > > I don't understand why everyone's tip-toeing around Firefox's > brokenness, here. Other applications don't seem to have problems with > in-place updates. Why isn't anyone filing bugs on Firefox upstream? > > -- > Adam Williamson > Fedora QA Community Monkey > IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org > http://www.happyassassin.net > > -- > fedora-test-list mailing list > fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list > Are you telling that I can update OpenOffice.org while running and it wil be completely functional without restarting? If that's the case, I'm filling bug on b.m.o. straight away. -- Vedran Miletić -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
