On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 21:55 -0500, Scott Robbins wrote: > I vaguely remember some discussion about fixing the layout of the > checksums so that it was clear one had to run sha256sum rather than > sha1. > > However, I see that it's still rather misleading in appearance--that is, > the words SHA1 sum are written there along with what I assume are the > sha256 sums. (I didn't actually download an ISO to check, but it seems > to be a lot of numbers for an sha1.) > > The nice people at distrowatch are apparently among the ones confused by > this, as their links to downloads also include links clearly marked > SHA1. > > A minor issue to be sure, but those who frequent the forums know how > Those Who Wish To Try The Latest will almost certainly be confused. > This is planned to be fixed in F13, it was too late to make this change for F12 when it really came to a head as we were past the feature freeze, and as the release engineer, I really should respect the feature freeze. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
