On Mon, 16 Nov 2009, Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote:
I've installed the rpmfusion free and non-free noarch rpms to my F12b
64-bit test system. Those both depend on the epel noarch rpm, and
therein lies an odd problem:
# yum -y update --skip-broken
Loaded plugins: presto, refresh-packagekit
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-x86_64 0:2.020-1.el5 set to be
updated
--> Processing Dependency: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) for package:
perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.020-1.el5-x86_64
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.020-1.el5.x86_64 from epel has depsolving
problems
--> Missing Dependency: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) is needed by
package perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.020-1.el5.x86_64 (epel)
Packages skipped because of dependency problems:
perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.020-1.el5.x86_64 from epel
Searching my downloads I spotted something very odd:
F12 Everything perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.008-82.fc12.x86_64.rpm
F13 Rawhide perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.008-84.fc13.x86_64.rpm
EPEL 5 perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.020-1.el5.x86_64.rpm
EPEL appears to have a newer version number than either F12 Everything
or F13 Rawhide, but the date of that 2.020-1 file is July 1, 2009.
How can this be reconciled???
why are you using epel and fedora together?
epel is for centos or rhel not for fedora.
-sv
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list