On 11/10/2009 09:24 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 09:02 -0800, John Poelstra wrote:
My impressions from this meeting were slightly different :-)
We noted that there are no known reasons that we are "not go" and that
we will continue testing until Wednesday when QA expects to have
completed the testing matrix. Maybe we are separated by semantics, but
"gone gold" or "completely done" was not an impression I left the
meeting with.
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2009-11-10/fedora-meeting.2009-11-10-01.01.log.html
Our impressions are indeed different. The go / no go meeting was the
point of no return. Once we go, there is no going back. We've made a
commitment to go with what we have, and let the various teams that need
time to prepare for the release to start their work, as much of that
work cannot be pulled back once done.
Let's say all of these things next time and be clear about what our next
steps are. I will try to help with that. Re-reading the meeting log,
none of the things announced about "going GOLD" were said at the
meeting. The "Go/No-Go" meetings for Alpha and Beta were handled
differently in that we kept optimistically testing after them vs. saying
we were "GO" and abruptly moving on to other things.
That was the disconnect for me.
John
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
