On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 09:44 +0200, cornel panceac wrote: > > > can you please pastebin or upload the full logs somewhere to > compare? > Thanks. > > -- > Adam Williamson > > ok, thnx. I don't see any significant difference between the two, except for ndiswrapper not attempting to load in the second. You know ndiswrapper is not a part of the Fedora kernel, right? Wherever you're sourcing it from, you need to make sure it's available / building for the 127 kernel as well as 122. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
