On Mon, 9 Nov 2009, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 23:02 +1100, David Timms wrote:
> > =====
> > # yum --enablerepo=rawhide update tiger\*
> > Loaded plugins: allowdowngrade, downloadonly, presto, refresh-packagekit
> > Setting up Update Process
> > No Packages marked for Update
> > =====
> > yum --enablerepo=rawhide list tiger\*
> > Loaded plugins: allowdowngrade, downloadonly, presto, refresh-packagekit
> > Installed Packages
> > tigervnc.i586 1.0.0-2.fc11 @updates
> > tigervnc-server.i586 1.0.0-2.fc11 @updates
> > Available Packages
> > tiger.i586 3.2.1-10.fc11 fedora
> > tiger.i686 3.2.1-11.fc12 rawhide
> > tigervnc.i686 1.0.0-1.fc12 rawhide
> > tigervnc-server.i686 1.0.0-1.fc12 rawhide
> > tigervnc-server-module.i686 1.0.0-1.fc12 rawhide
> > tigervnc-server-module.i586 1.0.0-2.fc11 updates
> > =====
> > $ rpmdev-vercmp 1.0.0-2.fc11 1.0.0-1.fc12
> > 0:1.0.0-2.fc11 is newer
> >
> > So, it appears that either the release must get a bumped to at
> > least -2 version, or we are going to need a release note to try to
> > explain our way out of this one ?
>
> File a bug against tigervnc, we'll need them to push a 0-day update.
ah, so there *was* an upgrade issue involving tigervnc. i feel so
vindicated. :-)
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry.
Web page: http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
========================================================================
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
