On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 11:17 -0500, Gene Czarcinski wrote: > On Monday 09 November 2009 10:40:13 Gene Czarcinski wrote: > > On Sunday 08 November 2009 16:04:40 Gene Czarcinski wrote: > > > On Sunday 08 November 2009 15:38:56 Jesse Keating wrote: > > > > On Sun, 2009-11-08 at 15:22 -0500, Gene Czarcinski wrote: > > > > > On two system ... regular bare metal and a laptop. Do you wnat them > > > > > here or should I open a BZ report? > > > > > > > > BZ is fine, please post the number here though. > > > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533740 > > > > > > Includes yum.log files and a copy of the screenshot > > > > Tested RC4 and it now works ... BZ report closed. > > As I was thinking about it, I notice that the list of optional additional > repositories now includes not just updates but updates-testing. This differs > from F11 where only the everything base and updates was listed. Yup. > Was this intentional? Nope. > Personally, I think this may be a good idea. However, will it cause problems > for some users who are not prepared to deal with software not completely > tested? It's unintended and different from F11 behaviour, but Jesse couldn't fix it safely (fixing it so this repo set gets displayed is a small and safe change, but fixing it not to show updates-testing is bigger, AIUI). We decided it was acceptable. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
