On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 19:34:32 -0500, "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > as a single example, my attempt to upgrade produced: > > --> Missing Dependency: libssl.so.8()(64bit) is needed by package > tigervnc-server-1.0.0-2.fc11.x86_64 (installed) > > if i read the situation correctly, openssl would be upgraded but > there *is* no newer version of tigervnc-server in rawhide, so the > current version would remain, with its dependency on the older (and > about to be replaced) version of openssl. hence, the dependency > failure. is that an accurate description of what is happening here? > > rday > > p.s. in fact, there is no package named "tigervnc-server" in f12 at > all, just tigervnc. How are you checking? tigervnc-server-1.0.0-1.fc12.i686 is installed on my machine. Looks like this is a case of the F11 updates version having a higher release number than the F12 version. Because it blocks the ssl update that's going to cause a mess. The easiest solution is to remove it before the update and then reinstall it afterwards. If you do the update in a yum shell you can probably avoid erasing it for a while, but it may be simpler for a package without a lot of dependencies to erase it. -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
