On Sat, 2009-11-07 at 05:21 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > I believe the appropriate action at this point is to debug your > > xpress 200m. With fire, and possibly a big stick with rusty nails in > > it. > > chances are good that's true. what's curious, however, is that > *some* distros (debian, suse) work just fine with that video chip. > fedora, though ... nothing but grief. go figure. Probably different X server / driver versions and config options. What seems consistent is that _some_ 200ms wind up not working with just about any X release. it just seems to be a particularly fragile chip for some reason... > > (seriously - what date remix did you try? it'll presumably be using > > the same X packages as every other spin/mix, so if you got one from > > yesterday you might have been bitten by the X server horkage, I > > guess.) > > i downloaded it maybe three days ago: > > http://fedora.roving-it.com/FedoraMoblin12-Beta2-LiveCD.iso > > and the fedora moblin page itself: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/FedoraMoblin > > suggests issues should be posted here or to the fedora-devel list. is > there an even newer spin i can test? I'm not sure if they're doing daily spins :/ I also don't know what versions of the X stuff wound up on their Beta 2 image. Peter Robinson, could you let us know? What kernel and xorg-x11-server versions are on the beta2 build? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
