On Fri, 2009-11-06 at 21:34 +1100, David Timms wrote: > On 11/05/2009 05:55 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Thu, 2009-11-05 at 05:48 +1100, David Timms wrote: > >> On 11/05/2009 03:25 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > sound issues have a very high barrier to being release blockers, because > > they can be fixed well with an update. issues that affect the critical > > path stuff (graphics, installer, network) have a lower barrier because > > fixing them with updates is much less optimal. > OK, I get that... but let's say your a reviewer... you are going to > write exactly what the release provides, not after post release updates. > > Good thing that part of the problem is fixed for non SSE3 CPUs, and they > are more likely to have a newer CPU for their testing... Yeah, I understand and mostly agree, and in an ideal world I'd like to take issues like this as blockers. For right now, though, it's not practical, it was enough of a nightmare getting most of the X blockers fixed :) If F13 goes well we might be able to get things like this addressed as part of the blocker process there. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
