On 10/25/2009 9:38 PM, James Cassell wrote: > On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 21:34:29 -0400, David <dgboles@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> >> You do understand just why you got the "negative feedback" about Nvidia >> correct? Since the code is no OSS they can not fix it or help you. > > Of course I understand. It just seemed to me that it was being > suggested that I put a bug in the fedora bugzilla about the SELinux > error having to do with VMware, which is why I brought it up. Fair enough. A misunderstanding. My guess(es) here would be: Fedora Bugzilla will not solve anything. The bug will probably just be closed since it can not be fixed by Fedora. The SELinux list *might* at least get you enough instructions to write an 'exception' rule. There is a different name for this but I can recall it at the moment. Vmware has their own Bugzilla. I just looked for it. I would think that there would be the place to report this. I would think that this is a bug that they would fix. Or at least offer a 'do this' fix for the user to apply. Good luck. -- David
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list