On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 12:23 AM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:17:51 -0700 > Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 10:36 -0400, Andre Robatino wrote: >> > I looked at the dates on the noarch packages on the F11 ISO and the >> > earliest modification date is March 9, about 3 months before F11 >> > Final. Does this mean that all noarch packages are expected to be >> > rebuilt before F13's release? >> >> sorry for the late reply. it's very likely; a full rebuild of all >> packages is done at least once for each release as a matter of policy, >> AIUI. > > Nope. A mass rebuild is done only when there is some reason to do > so. ;) > > In f11's rawhide cycle it was for sha256 hashes in rpms and to change > compiler options (i386->i586). > > In f12's rawhide cycle it has been xz payloads and (i586->i686). > > If there's a reason a mass rebuild will get done, but it's not a > requirement each cycle. > > kevin > > -- > fedora-test-list mailing list > fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list > But then it would be possible, if a package never gets updated and mass rebuild doesn't happen, that a package would carry old release tag, right? -- Vedran Miletić -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
