> Is it still necessary to have the images directory in the same directory as > the iso for HD installs now, Yes. > or has this been fixed so that the iso alone is > all that is needed? It won't be fixed. > If the images directory is still required, does this apply to nfs, http or > any other kinds of install?? It applies to any kind of ISO install. For non-ISO installs, there are some implicit assumptions made about the location of an install.img relative to the location of the tree, but these are all tweakable with the repo= and stage2= parameters. - Chris -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list