On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 11:28 -0400, campbecg@xxxxxxx wrote: > ---- "\"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson\"" <johannbg@xxxxx> wrote: > > On 10/09/2009 01:58 AM, Christopher Beland wrote: > > > On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 10:29 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > > > > > >> Does not actually matter what we call these pages as long as they have > > >> consistent naming and consistent layout. > > >> > > > I'm pretty ambivalent as well, but if are agreed that consistency in > > > naming is desired, we need to pick one system. My preferences are, in > > > order from best to worst: "ComponentX Problems", "How to Debug > > > ComponentX" and "Bug Info ComponentX". Perhaps someone can take a poll > > > at the next meeting. > > > > > > > > > > My preference are in the order from best to worst.. How to Debug , > > ComponentX Problems, Bug Info ComponentX > > As a reporter, looking at the wiki, I would see a page called "Bug > Info ComponentX" and expect a page relating to known bugs on > componentx, a page called "ComponentX Problems" to be full of known > issues related to using componentx, and "How to Debug ComponentX" at a > howto about how to actually debug it. Thanks for the input. For the record, I came up with the bug_info_X names, and I entirely agree that both how_to_debug_x and x_problems are better, my name sucks. :) -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
