On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:54:21 -0400, Kamil Paral <kparal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > So what do you think? Is it/is it not worth bothering? Do we > more often want anaconda included or have less problems when > building it? I think you make a case for it being a reasonable exception. I don't know if it is worth bothering with. Especially going forward there are supposed to be more safeguards against things breaking anaconda. I saw you put up instructions to cover how to handle building a test day image if anaconda is broken when you need to do the build. That might be good enough. -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
