ok, thanks for the clarification btw, "The resolutions CANTFIX, WONTFIX, and WORKSFORME are for use by maintainers only, and *are self-explanatory*." - oh my ... K. Dne Čt 24. září 2009 09:09:15 Adam Williamson napsal(a): > On Thu, 2009-09-24 at 08:57 +0200, Karel Volný wrote: > > > You can't close a bug filed on a > > > stable release as CLOSED RAWHIDE. It's up to the > > > maintainer, now, to choose whether he intends to fix this > > > for 11 as well as Rawhide. If he does, he can make the fix > > > and then do CLOSED ERRATA. If he only wants to fix in > > > Rawhide, he can do CLOSED WONTFIX with a comment that the > > > bug is fixed in Rawhide but won't be fixed for 11. > > > > ahem, I have to disagree a bit (or correct my understanding > > of the workflow :-)) > > > > Bugzilla help at > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=fields.html#status > > says: > > This is not the canonical reference for Fedora, as it says at > the top of the page: > > "Note: Bugs reported against Fedora products have a slightly > different life cycle which is described in more detail here." > > 'here' links to > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/BugStatusWorkFlow . > That is the canonical reference to Fedora. The page on > redhat.com is the canonical reference for RHEL. > > > on the other hand, CLOSED WONTFIX cannot be used: > > > > WONTFIX > > The problem described is a bug which will never be fixed. > > This may happen when there is significant divergence from > > upstream. An explaination of why this resolution has been > > chosen should be supplied. > > > > - if the bug is fixed in rawhide, you can't say that it will > > never be fixed > > Yes, you can, if the bug is filed on a specific Fedora release > which is not Rawhide. A bug which is filed against Fedora 11 > is not fixed unless an update is released for Fedora 11. If > it is fixed in Rawhide but no update is ever shipped for F11, > and the reporter and maintainer do not agree to re-assign the > bug to Rawhide, the correct resolution is WONTFIX, as the > maintainer has chosen not to fix the bug in the release > against which it was reported. > > This is somewhat a consequence of the fact that Bugzilla does > not work well for tracking bugs against multiple releases of > a distribution, which leads to these somewhat odd-looking > cases. But it's all we've got to work with. > -- Karel Volný QE BaseOs/Daemons Team Red Hat Czech, Brno tel. +420 532294274 (RH: +420 532294111 ext. 8262074) xmpp kavol@xxxxxxxxx :: "Never attribute to malice what can :: easily be explained by stupidity."
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
