On Wed, 2009-09-23 at 18:54 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2009-09-23 at 21:21 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > > I believe this bug _was_ filed against rawhide before F11 was released, > > and then move to F11 by some bug triage sweep. Looks like shooting > > yourself in your own foot, if you don't have the power to close the bug > > anymore, after you've moved it... > > yeah, that's a system that's somewhat controversial. there's no perfect > answer to the question 'should bugs filed on rawhide be switched to a > stable version once it's released'. At present we _do_ do this. It does > make sense sometimes; it potentially makes sense here. After all, if you > think about it, the initial bug request could be read as 'please port > this to PolicyKit 1.0 for Fedora 11', since it was filed during Fedora > 11 development period. No, not really. While this bug was filed during the F11 cycle, the plan for PolicyKit 1 has always been to land it early in the F12 cycle. The idea was to have most of the porting done by the time F12 opens. Just looking at when a bug was filed does not always tell you the full story of what version it is targeted at... -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
