Dave Jones (davej@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > This was exactly the reason I proposed this idea. We lose a days testing > of the kernel & installer far too often because of some inconseqential > dependancy breakage. "oh well, try tomorrow" gets old real fast > during times when we have different depfail every day. > > I agree we shouldn't _have_ dependancy failures, but as we don't have > anything in place to prevent them, I think it's like asking for ponies > at this point. Rather than continuing, it would be simpler to try and propagate them from the prior tree. Bill -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
