On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 01:51:09PM -0700, John Poelstra wrote: > Today was the first of many exciting blocker bug review meetings in > anticipation of the Fedora 12 Beta release. Thanks to everyone who > filed bugs and participated in the discussion. I think we saw a much > smoother release (or at least less surprises) of the Fedora 12 Alpha by > doing these reviews each week. Hopefully the same will be true for the > Beta and final release! I wanted to suggest https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518880 as a candidate for blocker status, because it's a regression in a well-publicized feature. (The maintainers are already aware of the problem and working on it, I'd just like to make sure it's not lost in the shuffle.) That criterion is worth considering generally for blocker status. But maybe it needs some refinement? -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
