On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 08:52:10AM -0500, Jeffrey Ollie wrote: > On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 8:38 AM, David Boles<dgboles@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > And why? > > Hopefully fewer people will ignore it. So what is one supposed to do if a package that one does not own is mentioned in the report? You hopefully know that maintainers seem to receive personal mails in case one of their packages has a broken dependency. At least I got this recently because of the openssl rebuild. Also the information is imho missing the important information of whether the broken dependency is there for more than N reports, i.e. did the maintainer of the package in question already have time to fix it. I do not see much value in many people have to read that a package of mine has a broken dependency, if I fix it before the next rawhide compose anyhow. Nevertheless I found it useful to get notifications of new packages in Rawhide, which are now not easily accessible. Regards Till
Attachment:
pgpl1GO7h4eoN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
