On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 13:53 -0400, Scott Robbins wrote: > On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 01:42:48PM -0400, James Laska wrote: > > On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 13:06 -0400, Scott Robbins wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ok, and netinstall.iso also only offers the choice of existing hard > > > > > drives. I believe this bug has already been filed, I know it has for > > > > > boot.iso. > > > > > > > > I believe this is bug#516973 - installer ignores askmethod > > > > > > Hrrm, marked as fixed. Errm, it's not. :) > > > > > > There is another still open however, 518194 > > > > That issue is in MODIFIED (and likely very related to bug#516973). > > > > > Looking at the bug, it seems it was supposd to be fixed with this > > > version of anaconda. :-( > > > (Grumble, grumble). > > > > Typically the anaconda bugs note a version number that the fix will be > > included in. In this case, the fix is noted in the anaconda git log > > (see > > http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=anaconda.git;a=commit;h=1fbf3c9d8d550fc01ae34528533377adc19d1611). This will be addressed in anaconda-12.16 or newer. Fedora 12 Alpha ships with anaconda-12.15. > > When I tried installing after just downloading CD1, it said 12.16. (I > didn't try with boot or net.iso, is it possible they're running with > 12.15? Very odd. I've repeated the same on the i386 and x86_64 disc1.iso and see anaconda-12.15. Can you confirm the sha256sum for the disc1 media you are using? Does it match the official checksums [1]? Are you booting and installing from the physical media (not booting the media, and installing from rawhide)? Thanks, James [1] http://download.fedora.devel.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/releases/test/12-Alpha/Fedora/i386/iso/Fedora-12-Alpha-i386-CHECKSUM
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
