On Mon, 10 Aug 2009 05:23:41 -0700 (PDT), Antonio wrote: > > > --- On Fri, 8/7/09, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > From: Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Subject: Re: rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 is needed by ????? > > To: "For testers of Fedora Core development releases" <fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Friday, August 7, 2009, 11:37 PM > > On Sat, 2009-08-08 at 08:08 +0200, > > Michael Schwendt wrote: > > > On Sat, 8 Aug 2009 11:26:53 +0530, Vishal wrote: > > > > > > > haven't been following this thread in detail but > > have you seen > > > > http://rawhidewatch.wordpress.com/2009/07/31/unable-to-update-to-rawhide-rpmlibpayloadisxz/ > > > > > It's out-of-date as it's a week old already. The > > needed RPM is distributed within > > > Rawhide as I showed in my previous reply. > > > > It's not out of date. We intentionally decided the F11 > > workaround is > > better as it requires fewer packages to be updated, and is > > tested to > > work. > > > > -- > > I am sorry to all, but none of the suggestions work :( You've missed the window during which the .fc11 RPM was offered in rawhide. Instead, you now get only a newer RPM build for .fc12, which depends on a newer glibc and xz, which cannot be installed because they require a newer RPM first. Chicken and egg. The only way to escape from that is the old work-around mentioned earlier in this thread. Disable rawhide repo, and update to the .fc11 RPM packages from updates-testing, 4.7.1-1.fc11. Sort of: yum --disablerepo=rawhide --enablerepo=updates-testing update rpm yum update yum yum update -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
