On Fri, 07 Aug 2009 23:37:14 -0700, Adam wrote: > On Sat, 2009-08-08 at 08:08 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > On Sat, 8 Aug 2009 11:26:53 +0530, Vishal wrote: > > > > > haven't been following this thread in detail but have you seen > > > http://rawhidewatch.wordpress.com/2009/07/31/unable-to-update-to-rawhide-rpmlibpayloadisxz/ > > > It's out-of-date as it's a week old already. The needed RPM is distributed within > > Rawhide as I showed in my previous reply. > > It's not out of date. We intentionally decided the F11 workaround is > better as it requires fewer packages to be updated, and is tested to > work. "Better" than what? What is written in that document about enabling updates-testing for old rawhide installs is out-of-date, since the .fc11 rpm build is distributed as part of rawhide meanwhile. Or else I would not have managed to run the work-around I posted. My Rawhide was old enough, too, as there are >1200 packages waiting to be downloaded. -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
