Thanks for raising these concerns Kamil! Comments below... On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 11:01 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote: > ----- "Liam" <lili@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > please select and execute test cases which best match your > > environment > > from our wiki page at: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Fedora_12_Alpha_Install_Test_Results > > > > I'm not sure how to test undocumented test cases. For example in > "Image Sanity" section all 4 test cases are not documented and I don't > know exactly what some of them mean. Can I find an explanation > somewhere? The idea of these tests surfaced as release engineering exit criteria checkpoints during the F-11 campaign. I've added Jesse Keating to the cc list for some guidance here. = QA:Testcase_Mediakit_ISO_Size = This seems a worthwhile test that we should include. I suspect this test is intended to ensure the ISO media is: * <= 700Mib for CD iso's * <= 4.7Gib for DVD iso's? <!-- needs clarification --> = QA:Testcase_Mediakit_ISO_Checksums = Unclear what the value of this test is. It's straightfoward to confirm that the ISO images posted match the provided checksums. But it's not clear = QA:Testcase_Mediakit_Repoclosure = I believe replaces the need for an @everything package install test. The intent is to use repoclosure to identify dependency conflicts without having to go through the hastle of booting a CD/DVD and manually selecting every package for install (even still the UI doesn't expose all packages on the media kit iirc). I suspect this test would be easier and better to run while the compose is being created. I don't know if that's possible, but if so ... perhaps we just need a place to add compose-time unit test scripts? = QA:Testcase_Mediakit_FileConflicts = Same as above. Thanks, James
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
