On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 12:27 -0400, Will Woods wrote: > On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 09:16 -0700, Tom London wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Will Woods<wwoods@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 16:23 -0400, Will Woods wrote: > > >> Hi folks, > > >> > > >> Here's the first draft of a plan describing Rawhide Acceptance Testing. > > > > > > Er. *here* it is: > > > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Rawhide_Acceptance_Test_Plan > > > > > > -w > > > > > Should test cases for both encrypted and unencrypted roots be included? > > Yes, but not here. This plan outlines a *very* basic check to see > whether Rawhide is even worth testing further. Tests for [un]encrypted root can be found in the installer test plan Liam posted earlier. https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/2009-June/msg00529.html Thanks, James
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
