On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 14:25 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 16:23 -0400, Will Woods wrote: > > On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 16:23 -0400, Will Woods wrote: > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > Here's the first draft of a plan describing Rawhide Acceptance Testing. > > > > Er. *here* it is: > > I can think of one thing, though it may (or may not, I'm not sure) be > hard to test in an automated way: does input work? > > AFAICT none of the other tests imply this, but a system that passes all > the other tests but into which you can't type anything isn't much use :) Very true - but very hard to automate without lego-mindstorms-style hackery. I think probably 'israwhidebroken.com' (or its sprititual equivalent) will need to have a box for "Other warnings" to allow people to make note of problems like these. Of course, that means it needs to allow user submissions, which makes the entire web thing a lot more complex. Alas. -w -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
