On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 23:14 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 06:52:43 -0700, > Steven I Usdansky <usdanskys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > At 79 MB, libgweather is one of the larger packages I have installed. > > Now, I think, "I really don't need libgweather, I'll just remove it". > > Just to be safe, I do a > > > > ~# rpm -q --whatrequires libgweather > > no package requires libgweather > > That's odd, here I get: > [root@bruno bruno]# rpm -q --whatrequires libgweather > libgweather-devel-2.26.1-1.fc11.i586 It's not really odd, just means Steven didn't have that package installed. No reason he would do, unless he was compiling stuff against it. > If you find a way to make that package optional (while keeping most of the > desktop), that would please a few live image maintainers. I assume it contains a bunch of data about different weather locations. Bit hard to live without. I mean, you could split the data up from the library file itself and thus satisfy the dependency without the size, I guess, but then the functions wouldn't really work... -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
