On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 12:22:57PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 12:15 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > Well, not quite. I think we can do everything in the release notes. How > > they are now doesn't have to be how they always are, nothing is > > immutable. > > > > If it turns out to be impossible to have release notes which both retain > > the breadth and depth of technical information of the current notes > > _and_ explain particular problems caused by changes and the workarounds > > for them in a way that users with little experience can understand, then > > we could look at alternative strategies. But I don't think doing both is > > an unrealistic goal. > > Fair enough, this is something where I suspect you have far more experience and knowledge than I do. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs_decisions_for_F12 > > which has some discussion of direction for the release notes for F12. We > may want to feed our discussion into that. Yes, we should probably take it off this list--again thanks to both of you. To the rest of the list, apologies for getting so sidetracked. -- Scott Robbins PGP keyID EB3467D6 ( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 ) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6 Willow: I knew it! I knew it! Well, not in the sense of having the slightest idea, but I knew there was something I didn't know. -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
