On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 10:31:57PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 06/10/2009 10:17 PM, Alan Milnes wrote: > > > > > LVM doesn't give the issues we are seeing today > > What sort of issues is that? If you want LVM and you want it without a > separate /boot, the issue is similar to the one with Ext4. > > - most people giving > > Fedora a go with the LiveCD won't have a separate boot partition. > > Disagree with that assertion. Most people using Live CD's will just use > the default scheme which is to have a separate /boot partition and won't > even notice anything. The people who care about their partition schemes > and filesystems are the minority by far. I don't think it's a matter of "most people." The folks I was referring to, in my original post about this, were what I call the drive by folks--those who see mention on Distrowatch or Slashdot, and try it. Hrrm, did the old live CD do LVM, and would it allow you to remove those and use a single partition? I was never much for the LiveCD's, so I don't know. I don't think it's bad that it's using ext4, I think a lot of people are excited about trying it. See our other discussions on the list about it though. -- Scott Robbins PGP keyID EB3467D6 ( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 ) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6 Buffy: See, this is a school. And we have students and they check out books and then they learn things. Giles: I was beginning to suspect that was a myth. -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
