On Sat, 6 Jun 2009 12:06:05 -0500 Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 00:26:40 -0600, > Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, 05 Jun 2009 00:44:31 +0530 > > > > I think for f12 it would be nice to have a more formalized process > > of testing the spins (ie, with checklists and tests and run at > > specific intervals). This would help us avoid any problems and > > remind people to do the testing. > > We are supposed to be making test plans for the spins. I didn't get > mine done for F11, but I am going to try to make some progress for > F12. Well, there was: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Spins_Test_Matrix but I think I was the only one to use it. ;) I'm glad I did because I found and fixed a selinux issue. > There was also some guidelines for testing builds regularly made > during the F11 cycle. Though how much testing was supposed to be done > at these is a bit vague. I suspect a lot of it is just making sure > the spin didn't get too big or that something critical didn't get > broken so that you notice some fixing needs to be done before it's > too late in the cycle. Yeah, it would be good to do some test runs before any milestone where they would be composed... > I think the plan is to get people doing this this time around. > Karnip's going to miss this biweekly meeting, so it probably won't > get talked about in the spins group seriously for another two weeks. Yep. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
