On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 20:54 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
[snip]
> When preparing any release (Alpha, Beta, Preview, RC, GA),
I realize this is being overly pedantic, but "GA" shouldn't be in the
list above. You don't prepare a "GA" release. You prepare and test an
RC release and if it passes the release criteria it is deemed a "GA."
Referring to "GA" as a separate spin/compose/whatnot gives people
(mostly developers :-)) the sense there's another build coming, so
changes can be targeted there. And trust me, there's nothing finding a
blocking bug at 2am just to have the developer tell you, "Yep, was
planning on getting that fixed in the GA spin."
- jkt
--
--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*
Jay Turner, Director, QE jkt@xxxxxxxxxx Red Hat, Inc.
"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human
stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former." - Albert Einstein
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
