On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 08:05 -0700, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote: > > Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > ...when SELinux blocks a legitimate operation on your system, file a bug > > on it, with the appropriate information included. > > This brings me to a question. What do other folks do when running > rdist(1) (or similar) on a system that has selinux enabled? I just > succeeded in locking myself out of a remote system when it updated > */.ssh/authorized_keys and the context was updated in a way that was > distasteful to selinux. > > Looking at the rdist man page I see no indication that rdist understands > contexts and tries to preserve them. Is this true? Bug? RFE? rsync supports preserving xattrs if you run it with the -X option. I'm not aware of similar support for rdist. Any particular reason for using rdist rather than rsync? -- Stephen Smalley National Security Agency -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
