On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
> > On 05/31/2009 04:32 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >
> > > um ... given your wording, can i assume that f11 is the first
> > > fedora where this package has been broken out? which would
> > > explain why this builds just fine under f10 for others?
> > >
>
> > On Sun, 31 May 2009, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > > Correct.
>
> On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > that appears to have fixed it. yee ha! buckets of thanks. i
> > can now update the wiki page to cover f11.
>
> Hello,
>
> I think I will add "glibc-static" into FEL's section on the comps.xml.
> Hence it will reduce pain for embedded designers.
i'm not convinced that's a good idea. there's no point polluting
the group sections with packages that might not be necessary. i think
it will be sufficient for tools like openembedded to generate their
own warnings. this isn't a fedora problem, let's not make it one.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry.
Web page: http://crashcourse.ca
Linked In: http://www.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
========================================================================--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
