On Sun, 31 May 2009, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 05/31/2009 04:42 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > On Sun, 31 May 2009, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > > >> On 05/31/2009 04:32 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > >> > >>> um ... given your wording, can i assume that f11 is the first > >>> fedora where this package has been broken out? which would explain > >>> why this builds just fine under f10 for others? > >> > >> Correct. > > > > that appears to have fixed it. yee ha! buckets of thanks. i can > > now update the wiki page to cover f11. > > You might want to tell upstream that static linking isn't the > recommended path. > > http://people.redhat.com/drepper/no_static_linking.html and yet f11 contains the statically-linked "insmod.static" executable, which is exactly what is being created at that step. so what's the difference? rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry. Web page: http://crashcourse.ca Linked In: http://www.linkedin.com/in/rpjday Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday ======================================================================== -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
