On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 10:36 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > A late discovered and just potentially fixed anaconda storage bug[1] has > necessitated another week slip of our schedule. The change is important > but invasive enough to require re-validating our storage tests. We were > already late in producing the Release Candidate and there is not enough > time to produce another one and validate it in time for next Tuesday's > release date. Therefor we have decided to enact another week long slip > of the release. This gives us time to create a second release candidate > and fully validate it and hand it off to the mirrors in plenty of time > to sync up for the new release date of June 9th. As much as we regret > slipping, we also wish to avoid easily trigger-able bugs in our release, > particularly in software that cannot be fixed with a 0-day update. > > At this time we would only accept tag requests for critical issues. > > [1]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500808 Does "critical issues" mean reviewed and approved F11Blocker bugs? Thanks, James
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
