Re: what package will give me /lib/ld-linux.so.2 on x86_64?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
On 05/20/2009 04:51 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Okay, we have glibc.x86_64, glibc.i686 installed and glibc.i586
available, why 586 and 686, I thought all the 386 became 586?

Oh, and the i586 and i686 can't be in at the same time.

Glibc is a relatively special case, where the compiler optimizations
used to compile it can actually have a significant effect across the
system, even if the other items are not compiled with the same set of
optimizations.

So, to sum it up simply:

On 32-bit x86
===
Pick One:
* i586 (good)
* i686 (better, but only if your hardware supports i686)

On 64-bit x86_64
===
Pick one:
* x86_64 (only option)

On a Multilib system (32bit and 64bit libs installed side by side)
===
* Pick One from the 32-bit x86 list (i586 or i686)
* Pick One from the 64-bit x86_64 list (x86_64)

This gets even more complicated on sparc, be glad you're on x86! :)

Thanks, you have clarified it and I'm keeping a copy in my folder of stuff I send people when they ask me questions I've eventually answered.

But the package I really want to use is still looking for the .i586 version, and the other stuff I have will use that, and performance is not an issue compared to network and display slowness.

Steve Dowe wrote:
>

> If you're intending on running an GUI application using 32-bit libs, you
> may also need to install some X components.
>
>
> su -c 'yum install glibc.i686 libXext.i586' should see to both,
> including dependencies.

I did try erasing glibc.i686 and installing glibc.i586, that got all of the programs but one going. One is still whining, I just haven't had time to chase it yet, but I think that the two of you have defined the issues well enough to get me to a solution eventually when I bang on it one more time. I suspect that removing more i686 and dropping to i586 will do the job.

Thanks to both of you, and the other folks who offered suggestions, I appreciate the thought.

--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
  "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked."  - from Slashdot

--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux