On Tue, 19 May 2009 17:06:49 -0700 Adam Williamson wrote: > There's no such thing as a DPI that's 'best for you'. DPI means dots per > inch. The correct DPI is a pure mathematical calculation based on the > size of the display and the resolution in use. There is no room for > subjectivity. It is utter and complete nonsense like this which leads to so many idiotic decisions in linux. Caring about DPI having a formally correct definition is for those afflicted with OCD. Being able to read the damn characters most apps put on the screen is what virtually everyone in the real world would prefer. There are two ways to make the characters readable: 1. Rewrite every app in creation to conform to yet another new complicated Xorg visibility layer for applying magnification factors computed from visual acuity of the user, and distance from display, combined with several years worth of human factors AI algorithms. 2. Lie about the DPI and achieve the mathematically identical effect without modifying a single app. In fact, quite a lot of monitors don't report the correct physical dimensions, so unless you can lie about the DPI, you can't even correct these display devices to show the absolute anally correct DPI, much less the DPI that makes characters visible on your 52DPI HD monitor you are sitting 3 feet away from. -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
