On Sun, 2009-05-17 at 13:58 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Sun, 2009-05-17 at 11:48 -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote: > > On Sun, 2009-05-17 at 09:43 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > On Sat, 2009-05-16 at 19:11 +0200, Valent Turkovic wrote: > > > > http://keithp.com/blogs/Sharpening_the_Intel_Driver_Focus/ > > > > > > > > If you wondered why Intel sucks on Fedora read this article, it > > > > expains all complexities of Intel drivers and for me it shows hope > > > > that Intel drivers are becoming better. > > > > > > Please don't cross-post. I already saw this on fedora-list, probably > > > along with everyone else here. > > > > I didn't, because I'm not subscribed to fedora-list. > > Your choice, but I'd have to ask why. In a couple of weeks all the F11 > stuff is going to go there and not here. It doesn't seem logical to > subscribe to f-t-l and not to f-l, but again, that's your call. I'd be > very surprised if it was the common case. If you only used Rawhide, it'd be a logical choice. Also if you're only interested in being part of the QA or Bugzappers teams; their traffic is intended to go to this list and there's no intrinsic reason for people in those groups to be be on f-l. I've thought for a while this list could stand to be split up, but don't seem to have much support for the idea. :\ (Right now I'm not subscribed to f-l either, FWIW, but that's probably not too logical, I should probably read that stuff. I just don't have time.) -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
