On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 08:39 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > If the ON_QA state isn't meaningful for Fedora then this state machine > > probably needs some adjustment for that, but it's not insane on its > > own terms. > > The ON_QA / FAILS_QA loop doesn't make too much sense for Fedora as > there is no paid QA group wired into this loop. 'QA' is the reporter. > > I think it should just be a simple setup as the reporter describes; > reporters should be allowed to set bugs back to ASSIGNED from MODIFIED. Ug, sorry - I'm thinking too much about Rawhide here. The ON_QA loop is of course used for Fedora in stable release updates. I think the question comes down to "should the onus / ability to return a bug to ASSIGNED when it fails testing be on the reporter or maintainer or both". Thoughts? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
