On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 12:54 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote: > On Mon, 04 May 2009 12:14:38 -0400 > James Laska wrote: > > > Fedora 11 hosts a number of virtualization improvements > > Just out of curiosity, is "documentation" ever likely to > show up as an improvement? :-). It took months for me > to get to where I had a vague idea what was going on with > Xen and how to fiddle things that weren't available directly > in virt-manager. KVM seems to be even more undocumented > than Xen. Thanks for your comments Tom. Much like testing, documentation is always an area for improvement. And I imagine it largely depends on what level of detail, and the use-cases, you are looking for documentation assistance on. I'm guessing by your comment you're interested in some of the low level differences between xen/qemu/kvm. Please correct if I've guessed incorrectly. I've had a lot of luck reading up on API's, file formats and the like at the libvirt project site ... http://libvirt.org/docs.html. Let me know if that is the level of detail you're looking for. When RHEL5 was released, there was a focused effort to provide comprehensive documentation around Xen and supported configurations. While I gather much of this has changed in Fedora, it may be useful for background reading http://www.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/5/html/Virtualization_Guide/index.html. One thing I've referenced several times while playing with Virtualization in Fedora is http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Virtualization_Quick_Start. This document appears to be actively maintained. Lastly, you might be interested in following the Virt updates posted to the fedora weekly news (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Documentation_Virtualization_Beat). Thanks, James
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
