On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 19:25 +0300, shmuel siegel wrote: > Will Woods wrote: > > On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 13:28 +0300, shmuel siegel wrote: > > > >> What is more confusing is that it said that it was installing fc9 > >> modules and updating fc10 modules even though nearly everything in > >> /var/cache/yum/preupgrade/packages is fc11. > > > > There are some .fc10 packages in the F11 repos, so that's not completely > > unexpected. Where did you see anything about .fc9 packages? > > > Could be a misinterpretation on my part, but part of the error dump was > the contents of /mnt/sysimage/root.install.log which said things like > "Installing setup-2.6.14-1.fc9.noarch" /root/install.log is the log from the *original* install. The anaconda exception handler grabs that file automatically, regardless of whether it's new or not. Check the timestamp on the file to confirm. -w -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
