On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 08:51 +0200, Gianluca Sforna wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 7:53 AM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, guys. Just a note that I've created > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497966 - alias AlsaVolume - > > as a tracker bug for reports of cases where the PulseAudio volume > > control can't usefully control the volume because another mixer channel > > needs to be adjusted (e.g. no matter what you set the > > gnome-volume-control slider to, you have to open alsamixer and set PCM > > to 100% before you hear any sound). > > Is this the kind of bugs that are fixed by creating an entry in the > ALSA db? if so, it would be nice to add there a reference to the > procedure required to create the required data on the affected > machine. In some cases that's the fix, in others it needs to be fixed in PulseAudio (it depends if we only need to change the *initial default level* for a second mixer element - in which case we add an entry to the ALSA db - or if a second mixer element *needs to be varied dynamically* when you adjust the single volume slider - in which case Pulse has to be adjusted to handle this). I'll add a comment to the bug with a note on what information people need to report for bugs of this type, thanks for the suggestion. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
