Re: DNS issues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> I have found out that nss-mdns.i586 caused the trouble, see here:
> [...]

What did the /etc/nsswitch.conf file look like after you installed only
the i586 package?  What I see is that

   mdns4_minimal [NOTFOUND=return]

gets inserted into the hosts line.  This shouldn't cause any problems
(and my testing confirms this).  In this case the missing x86-64 module
is causes the mdns4_minimal entry to be ignored.

If there is something like [UNAVAIL=return] or [!SUCCESS=return] then
this is a problem because the UNAVAIL action is used in case the module
is missing.

- --
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkn0kZYACgkQ2ijCOnn/RHQAIgCfYDB75nv+h/D2j+MKscwrCOo3
GMUAnRxvDVDNkicHyVefoPyDbZxtmhWZ
=+2XC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux